Space Insurance Regulations: What's Required and What's Changing

Space is inherently risky. Rockets explode, satellites fail, and debris from space operations can damage property on the ground or other assets in orbit. Space insurance exists to manage these risks, and a complex web of regulations determines what coverage is required, who bears liability, and how governments backstop catastrophic losses.

The space insurance market has grown to approximately $600 million in annual premiums, covering launch, in-orbit operations, and third-party liability. But the regulatory framework governing space insurance was designed in an era of a few dozen government launches per year, not the 300-plus orbital launches now flown every year, most of them commercial (about 330 orbital launch attempts worldwide in 2025).

What Insurance Is Legally Required?

U.S. Requirements (FAA)

Under the Commercial Space Launch Act (51 U.S.C. Chapter 509), any entity conducting a licensed launch or reentry must obtain:

• Third-party liability insurance: Coverage for damage to third parties (people, property) caused by the launch or reentry. The FAA sets a Maximum Probable Loss (MPL) for each mission, typically ranging from $100 million to $500 million depending on the vehicle, trajectory, and launch site.
• Government property insurance: Coverage for damage to U.S. government property, also set at the MPL level.
• Financial responsibility demonstration: Operators must prove they can cover the MPL amount through insurance, self-insurance, or other financial instruments.

The FAA does not require operators to insure the launch vehicle or payload itself. First-party property insurance (covering the operator's own rocket and satellite) is voluntary, though nearly all commercial operators carry it.

The Three-Tier Liability System

The U.S. operates a distinctive three-tier liability system for commercial space launches:

1. Tier 1 (Operator insurance): The licensee covers losses up to the MPL amount (typically $100M-$500M).
2. Tier 2 (Government indemnification): If losses exceed the operator's insurance, the U.S. government may pay claims above that level up to $1.5 billion in 1988 dollars, adjusted for inflation (several billion dollars today). Any payment requires a Congressional appropriation.
3. Tier 3 (Operator liability): For losses exceeding both the operator's insurance and government indemnification, liability reverts to the operator.

This indemnification system was modeled after the Price-Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act, which provides a similar government backstop for nuclear power plant accidents. The rationale is identical: the activity benefits the public, the risks are catastrophic but low-probability, and the private insurance market alone cannot absorb worst-case losses.

International Requirements

• France: The French Space Operations Act requires operators to carry third-party liability insurance. CNES reviews insurance adequacy as part of launch authorization.
• United Kingdom: The Outer Space Act 1986 requires licensees to indemnify the UK government against claims under the Liability Convention. The government typically requires insurance of at least EUR 60 million.
• European Union: No unified EU space insurance regulation. Requirements vary by member state.
• Australia: The Space (Launches and Returns) Act 2018 requires insurance or financial assurance covering third-party liability. The responsible party must indemnify the Commonwealth.

Types of Space Insurance Coverage

Launch Insurance

Covers damage to or loss of the launch vehicle and/or payload during the launch phase (typically from intentional ignition through orbit insertion). Premiums range from 5-20% of insured value, varying by vehicle track record, mission complexity, and payload value.

In-Orbit Insurance

Covers satellite failure, anomalies, or reduced capability during the operational life of the satellite. Premiums are typically 0.5-2% of insured value per year. Policies may cover total loss, partial loss (reduced transponder capacity), and station-keeping failures.

Third-Party Liability Insurance

Covers claims from third parties for bodily injury or property damage caused by launch, reentry, or in-orbit operations. As noted above, the FAA sets MPL amounts for each mission.

Debris Liability Insurance

An emerging category covering liability from orbital debris. As debris regulations tighten and the risk of collision increases, dedicated debris liability coverage is becoming more common. The Liability Convention (1972) establishes that launching states are liable for damage caused by their space objects, including debris.

The International Liability Framework

The Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects (1972) establishes two liability standards:

• Absolute liability: A launching state is absolutely liable for damage caused by its space object on the surface of the Earth or to aircraft in flight. No fault needs to be proven.
• Fault-based liability: For damage caused in outer space (e.g., satellite-to-satellite collision), the claimant must prove the launching state was at fault.

The Convention has only been invoked once for a formal claim: Canada's claim against the Soviet Union after the Cosmos 954 satellite scattered radioactive debris across northern Canada in 1978. The USSR paid CAD $3 million in settlement.

What's Changing in Space Insurance Regulation

Indemnification Renewal Debate

The U.S. government indemnification provision (Tier 2) requires periodic Congressional reauthorization. Each renewal sparks debate about whether the government should continue backstopping commercial launches. Critics argue that the commercial space industry is mature enough to self-insure. Proponents counter that removing the backstop would make U.S. launches less competitive internationally.

Mega-Constellation Risk Aggregation

Operators deploying thousands of satellites face unique insurance challenges. The risk of a single debris-creating event affecting multiple satellites in the same orbital shell creates aggregation risk that traditional space insurance models struggle to price. Insurers are developing new products for constellation-level coverage rather than per-satellite policies.

In-Orbit Servicing and Liability

As in-orbit servicing, assembly, and manufacturing (ISAM) activities increase, the question of liability transfer becomes critical. When a servicing vehicle docks with a client satellite and something goes wrong, which party's insurance responds? Current regulations do not adequately address these scenarios.

Active Debris Removal Liability

Companies developing active debris removal (ADR) services face a regulatory gap: touching another operator's defunct satellite creates potential liability even if the purpose is cleanup. No existing insurance product specifically covers ADR operations, and regulators are still determining how to license these activities.

Parametric Insurance

New insurance products using parametric triggers (automatic payouts based on measurable events like solar particle events or conjunction warnings) are emerging. These products could reduce claims processing time from months to hours for space weather-related satellite anomalies.

Track space insurance regulations, liability requirements, and market trends with SpaceNexus.

Explore SpaceNexus Space Insurance Intelligence