This period closed before the release began publishing on a calendar. The figures are computed from the same tables, but this is a back-calculation rather than what we would have published at the time. Scheduled editions begin with 2026-Q3.
Space-coded obligations
$431M
$64.3M in Q1 2026
Companies winning space work
15
27 space-coded awards of 283 federal awards recorded
NASA share of space-coded
43.5%
DoD 56.5%; the rest is every other agency
Top five share
92.1%
HHI 2,764 across 15 companies
Space-coded federal obligations by company, Q2 2026
Tracked companies ranked by the federal dollars obligated to them on awards the government codes as space work, with the agency that gave the most and how much rides on their single largest award.
Space-coded federal obligations by company, Q2 2026. Tracked companies ranked by the federal dollars obligated to them on awards the government codes as space work, with the agency that gave the most and how much rides on their single largest award. Showing the first 10 of 15 rows.
#
Company
Space obligated
Awards
Lead agency
Top award share
Concentration
1
Blue Origin
$191.1M
4
DoD
65.5
heavily concentrated
2
Northrop Grumman
$102.0M
2
DoD
100
single-award dependent
3
Astrobotic
$48.3M
Space-coded federal obligations by company, trailing twelve months
The same ranking over the four quarters ending with this one. Federal obligations are lumpy — one large award can own a quarter — so this is the stabler table and the one to cite.
Space-coded federal obligations by company, trailing twelve months. The same ranking over the four quarters ending with this one. Federal obligations are lumpy — one large award can own a quarter — so this is the stabler table and the one to cite. Showing the first 10 of 25 rows.
#
Company
Space obligated
Awards
Lead agency
Top award share
Concentration
1
Blue Origin
$246.7M
6
DoD
50.8
concentrated
2
Firefly Aerospace
$104.5M
3
NASA
74.6
heavily concentrated
3
Northrop Grumman
$102.0M
Awarding agencies for space work, Q2 2026
Where the space money came from. Agency mix is a risk measure: a company whose federal revenue is one agency’s budget line is exposed to that agency’s appropriation in a way a company selling across four is not.
Awarding agencies for space work, Q2 2026. Where the space money came from. Agency mix is a risk measure: a company whose federal revenue is one agency’s budget line is exposed to that agency’s appropriation in a way a company selling across four is not. 2 rows.
#
Agency
Obligated
Share of quarter
Awards
Companies
1
DoD
$243.5M
56.5
11
9
2
NASA
$187.6M
43.5
9
7
Shares are of the space-coded dollars in this edition, not of the agency’s whole budget. NASA obligated far more to organisations we do not track than to those we do.
Awarding agencies for space work, trailing twelve months
The same agency split over the four quarters ending with this one.
Awarding agencies for space work, trailing twelve months. The same agency split over the four quarters ending with this one. 3 rows.
#
Agency
Obligated
Share of TTM
Awards
Companies
1
NASA
$383.7M
57.5
32
12
2
DoD
$283.2M
42.5
18
11
3
Interior
$15K
0
1
1
All federal obligations to tracked companies, Q2 2026
The same companies ranked by their ENTIRE federal book, with the share of it the government codes as space. This is the table that separates a pure-play space company from a diversified prime — and the left-hand number is emphatically not a space figure.
All federal obligations to tracked companies, Q2 2026. The same companies ranked by their ENTIRE federal book, with the share of it the government codes as space. This is the table that separates a pure-play space company from a diversified prime — and the left-hand number is emphatically not a space figure. Showing the first 10 of 35 rows.
#
Company
All federal
Of which space-coded
Space share
Awards
1
Lockheed Martin
$8.62B
$0
0
29
2
Northrop Grumman
$708.4M
$102.0M
14.4
20
3
Booz Allen Hamilton
$318.0M
$0
Companies winning their first recorded space award
Tracked companies with an attributed space-coded award inside this quarter and none in our records before it. Our records begin 2018-10-01.
Companies winning their first recorded space award. Tracked companies with an attributed space-coded award inside this quarter and none in our records before it. Our records begin 2018-10-01. 1 rows.
Company
Space obligated
Awards
Agency
Anduril Industries
$100K
2
DoD
"First" means first in our records over a window beginning 2018-10-01 — not first ever. A company that last won space work before that window reads as new here, and that is a limit of the window, not a finding. Absence from the previous 4 quarters alone is not enough: the whole of our history before this quarter is checked.
Space awards against private funding, trailing twelve months
Tracked companies that both won space-coded federal money and raised privately inside the same twelve months. The two columns are different kinds of money and are never added together.
Space awards against private funding, trailing twelve months. Tracked companies that both won space-coded federal money and raised privately inside the same twelve months. The two columns are different kinds of money and are never added together. 6 rows.
Company
Space obligated
Awards
Rounds
Disclosed raised
Firefly Aerospace
$104.5M
3
2
$1.02B
HawkEye 360
$23.9M
4
2
$566.0M
Astranis
$7.6M
4
1
$300.0M
Interlune
$110K
2
Awards behind these tables, Q2 2026
Every attributed award obligated inside the quarter, largest first, with the recipient exactly as the government spells it, the code that makes it space work or not, and a link to the award record.
Awards behind these tables, Q2 2026. Every attributed award obligated inside the quarter, largest first, with the recipient exactly as the government spells it, the code that makes it space work or not, and a link to the award record. Showing the first 10 of 283 rows.
•Every figure is a count, a sum, a share, a maximum or a Herfindahl index over the FederalAward table, which is built from USAspending.gov — the US Treasury’s public record of federal spending. No estimate, model or projection is used anywhere in this release, and every stored award carries the usaspending.gov URL it was read from.
•Every dollar figure is the SPACE-CODED subset: awards the government itself codes as space work through the award’s own product/service code (space vehicles, space R&D, space transportation and launch) or industry code (space research and technology, satellite telecommunications). Several tracked companies are diversified primes whose federal business is mostly aircraft, missiles and services, and reporting their whole federal book as space would be arithmetically correct and completely misleading. The all-federal figure is published beside the space figure, never instead of it.
•The space-coded flag deliberately excludes the "guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing" industry codes, which conflate tactical missiles with spacecraft. Space work under those codes almost always carries a space product/service code as well, so the loss is small — but every space figure here is a conservative floor rather than a ceiling.
What this edition can and cannot see
Coverage limits travel with the numbers, here and in every export of them.
•This edition sees 283 attributed federal awards obligated inside the quarter, of which 27 are coded as space work. Space-coded obligations total $431M, against $11.1B of federal obligations of every kind to the same companies.
•Every dollar figure on this page is the SPACE-CODED subset: awards the government itself codes as space work through the award’s own product/service code (space vehicles, space R&D, space transportation and launch) or its industry code (space research and technology, satellite telecommunications). That flag is set membership over two coded fields on the government record — never a keyword search, a judgement of ours, or a model.
•The space-coded flag deliberately EXCLUDES the "guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing" industry codes, which conflate tactical missiles with spacecraft. Space work under those codes almost always carries a space product/service code as well, so the loss is small — but it means every space figure here is a conservative floor rather than a ceiling.
•The all-federal table is published beside the space tables on purpose. For a diversified prime, the all-federal figure is its ENTIRE government book — aircraft, missiles, ships, services — and is not a statement about its space business.
Sources and licences
The same credits are written into every CSV and JSON export of this data, so a downloaded file still names its sources.
UK Companies House — Company registration data from the UK Companies House register. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Open Government Licence v3.0
Cite this edition
Cite or embed this data
Citation
SpaceNexus Federal Space Awards, Q2 2026. SpaceNexus, data as of 2026-06-30. https://spacenexus.us/releases/federal-space-awards/2026-Q2. https://spacenexus.us/releases/federal-space-awards/2026-Q2 (retrieved 2026-09-18).
Free to cite and embed with attribution. Data updates continuously; the citation date pins your retrieval.
SN
By SpaceNexus Research
Computed from SpaceNexus data - no model is involved in producing a release
Every figure here is arithmetic over our own rows — counts, sums, deltas and rankings — and the page and its export are built by the same code, so they cannot disagree. How this edition is computed
2
NASA
50
concentrated
4
Intuitive Machines
$29.6M
3
NASA
99.7
single-award dependent
5
Firefly Aerospace
$25.9M
1
NASA
100
single-award dependent
6
L3Harris Technologies
$19.2M
2
NASA
100
single-award dependent
7
HawkEye 360
$13.9M
2
DoD
90.4
single-award dependent
8
Rocket Lab
$433K
1
NASA
100
single-award dependent
9
Loft Orbital
$300K
1
NASA
100
single-award dependent
10
Anduril Industries
$100K
2
DoD
100
single-award dependent
Computed over 27 space-coded awards of the 283 attributed federal awards recorded in the quarter. Every row also carries its all-federal total and space share in the export.
Showing the first 10 of 15 rows. 5 more in this table, plus every column the display leaves out.
The complete row set and its CSV and JSON exports are part of a SpaceNexus Research seat. The figures above are computed from exactly the same rows, so the summary and the export can never disagree. What a Research seat covers.
3
DoD
100
single-award dependent
4
Intuitive Machines
$84.8M
7
NASA
55.2
concentrated
5
Astrobotic
$48.9M
3
NASA
49.4
concentrated
6
HawkEye 360
$23.9M
4
DoD
52.4
concentrated
7
L3Harris Technologies
$19.2M
2
NASA
100
single-award dependent
8
Planet Labs
$15.0M
2
DoD
50
concentrated
9
Astranis
$7.6M
4
DoD
98.7
single-award dependent
10
Gravitics
$6.6M
1
DoD
100
single-award dependent
Computed over 65 space-coded awards obligated between 2025-07-01 and 2026-06-30. Trailing-twelve-month dollars: $667M.
Showing the first 10 of 25 rows. 15 more in this table, plus every column the display leaves out.
The complete row set and its CSV and JSON exports are part of a SpaceNexus Research seat. The figures above are computed from exactly the same rows, so the summary and the export can never disagree. What a Research seat covers.
0
20
4
Palantir Technologies
$271.8M
$0
0
9
5
Blue Origin
$191.1M
$191.1M
100
4
6
L3Harris Technologies
$174.8M
$19.2M
11
12
7
Anduril Industries
$157.8M
$100K
0.1
17
8
SAIC
$125.7M
$0
0
24
9
General Dynamics
$90.8M
$0
0
4
10
Lunar Outpost
$88.0M
$0
0
1
For a diversified prime this row is aircraft, missiles, ships and services as well as space. It is published so the space figure can be read in context, never as a measure of space business.
Showing the first 10 of 35 rows. 25 more in this table, plus every column the display leaves out.
The complete row set and its CSV and JSON exports are part of a SpaceNexus Research seat. The figures above are computed from exactly the same rows, so the summary and the export can never disagree. What a Research seat covers.
1
$500K
Anduril Industries
$100K
2
1
$5.00B
Axiom Space
$0
2
1
$525.0M
Federal obligations are revenue the company has to earn by delivering; a funding round is capital it sold equity for. Comparing them says something about a company’s mix of customers and backers and nothing about its profitability. Rounds with an undisclosed amount contribute $0.
The space-coded column is the government’s own product/service or industry code for the award, not our reading of it; the code and its official description travel with every row in the export. Rows marked "no" under counts-toward-totals are indefinite-delivery vehicles, listed for the contract-vehicle intelligence they carry and excluded from every dollar figure.
Showing the first 10 of 283 rows. 273 more in this table, plus every column the display leaves out.
The complete row set and its CSV and JSON exports are part of a SpaceNexus Research seat. The figures above are computed from exactly the same rows, so the summary and the export can never disagree. What a Research seat covers.
•
Only PRIME awards are counted. A company working as a subcontractor on another firm’s prime contract does not appear, because USAspending’s subaward file is reported voluntarily and incompletely and we will not mix the two.
•Amounts are the OBLIGATED total USAspending reports on the award — money actually placed on contract — not an announced ceiling. A multi-year IDIQ with a headline value appears only as the orders placed against it.
•Indefinite-delivery vehicles are stored and listed but contribute $0 to every dollar figure: their reported value is the sum of the orders under them, and those orders are counted individually, so counting both would count the same money twice.
•An award is attributed to the quarter its BASE OBLIGATION date falls in, in UTC — the date the award was originally made. A modification that adds money updates the existing award in place rather than creating a second row, so this release measures awards WON in the quarter, not dollars flowing in the quarter. Those are different questions and the page says which one it answers.
•A recipient is attributed to a tracked company only on an exact Unique Entity ID match, an exact name match once corporate form is stripped, or a name that is the company’s own followed solely by generic corporate or federal-contracting words. Nothing fuzzy is accepted, a recipient that would match two companies is attributed to neither, and every stored row records the government’s spelling of the recipient alongside the match quality.
•Concentration bands are the one judgement in this release and are fixed: a company whose largest single award is 90% or more of its federal total is called single-award dependent, 60% or more heavily concentrated, 35% or more concentrated, and below that spread. The underlying percentage is published beside the band.
•Defense contract records reach USAspending on a reporting lag of up to 90 days, so the most recent quarter is systematically incomplete and grows when the edition is recomputed. Each edition prints the moment it was computed.
•Classified and unacknowledged procurement is not published on USAspending at all. For a company whose federal business is largely classified, every figure here is a floor of unknown depth.
•Prime awards only, and only those we could attribute to a tracked company with high confidence. Subawards are not counted: a company working as a subcontractor on somebody else’s prime contract does not appear here at all.
•Amounts are what USAspending reports as OBLIGATED on the award — money actually put on contract — not an announced ceiling or a potential maximum. A ten-year IDIQ worth a headline billion shows up here only as the orders placed against it.
•Indefinite-delivery vehicles are stored and listed, but contribute $0 to every dollar figure. Their reported value is the sum of the orders placed under them, and those orders are counted individually, so counting both would count the same money twice.
•We searched 230 of 331 tracked companies against USAspending; 20 were deliberately not searched by name because their name is too generic to match safely and we hold no Unique Entity ID for them. A company we did not search cannot appear, whatever it won.
•Matching is precision-first and deliberately misses things. A federal arm whose name does not begin with the parent’s name — a joint venture, or a subsidiary trading under an unrelated brand — is not attributed to the parent. Every attributed row records the government’s spelling of the recipient and how the match was made.
•10 company(ies) returned more awards than one sweep stores (Booz Allen Hamilton, Curtiss-Wright Corporation, Elbit Systems, General Dynamics, L3Harris Technologies, Leonardo, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and others). For those, the largest awards by obligated amount are held and every total is a floor.
•Our award window begins 2018-10-01. Awards obligated before that date are not in our records, and "first federal award" below means first in OUR records, not first ever.
•An award is attributed to the quarter its BASE OBLIGATION date falls in — the date the award was originally made. A modification that adds money to an existing award updates that award’s amount in place; it does not appear as new activity in the quarter of the modification. This release therefore measures awards WON in the quarter, not dollars flowing in the quarter, and those are different questions.
•Defense contract records reach USAspending on a reporting lag of up to 90 days, so the most recent quarter is systematically incomplete and grows when the edition is recomputed. This edition states the moment it was computed.
•Classified and unacknowledged procurement does not appear on USAspending at all. For a company whose federal business is largely classified, the figures here are a floor of unknown depth and should not be read as its federal revenue.
•Every figure on this page is a count, a sum, a share, a maximum or a Herfindahl index over our own rows. Nothing is model-generated, estimated or projected, and every row carries the usaspending.gov URL it was read from.