Week in Space Data, every Friday.
By the SpaceNexus Desk
AI-drafted analysis, fact-checked before it publishes
Drafted by AI, fact-checked before publishing, corrected in public. How the desk works
On Monday, September 28, 2026, NASA and Boeing outlined a revised path for the Starliner spacecraft. NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman framed the update as part of a broader push in human spaceflight, saying, "We are living through the most exciting era of space exploration since Apollo." The specifics were more sober than the rhetoric.
According to reporting from NASASpaceflight, Payload Space and Ars Technica, the plan has these elements:
The backdrop is the 2024 Crew Flight Test, which Payload Space described as a dicey mission that left astronauts Butch Wilmore and Sunita Williams on the International Space Station for nine months, well beyond the planned short stay. Boeing then spent two years upgrading and redesigning parts of the spacecraft.
An Ars Technica piece quoted Boeing as being "incredibly excited" to serve in the role of the nation's astronaut transportation. That framing deserves scrutiny, since SpaceX's Crew Dragon is currently flying NASA crews, and Crew-13 is preparing to launch on October 1. A related line from the same report, "We couldn't provide detailed pricing to the CLD suppliers," hints at a separate tension between the crew transportation contract and the emerging commercial LEO destination (CLD) market, where station developers need to know what transportation will cost.
Sources:
About this analysis
Written by the SpaceNexus Desk: a language model drafts each piece from the sources listed above, a second model pass fact-checks it against those sources, and drafts that fail that check are held for a person. No human typed this article. How the desk works · Report a correction
For information only, not investment advice. SpaceNexus is not a registered investment adviser, broker or dealer, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. Data may be delayed, estimated or incomplete; check the source before acting. Full disclaimer
This announcement decides whether the United States keeps two independent ways of sending astronauts to orbit. The Commercial Crew Program was built around redundancy. When one provider is grounded, the other keeps the station staffed. That redundancy has been lost in practice since 2024, and NASA has relied on SpaceX for crew rotations ever since.
By exercising options for two more flights and funding the return to flight, NASA has chosen to keep Boeing in the program rather than end it. That choice is expensive in both dollars and time. A crewed flight in 2028 implies that Starliner would sit out roughly four years after its first crewed attempt. In that period the ISS moves closer to its planned retirement, so the number of rotation flights Starliner can perform before the station is decommissioned is limited.
The launch vehicle question adds a second layer. Starliner was designed around the Atlas V, which United Launch Alliance is retiring as its remaining inventory is consumed. Certifying a new rocket for crew is a large regulatory and engineering task in its own right. NASA's crew certification process requires demonstrated reliability, abort system integration and extensive analysis. Any new vehicle must fit those standards, and the schedule risk is not captured by the 2028 date alone.
The plan buys optionality for NASA, but it does so by spending money and years on a vehicle that has yet to complete a fully successful crewed mission.
One free email on Fridays: launches flown, funding rounds, hiring and schedule slips from our own trackers, plus next week's launches. One click to leave.
The decision reinforces a pattern of NASA supporting incumbent providers through technical setbacks instead of switching to alternatives. Fixed-price commercial contracts were designed to shift risk to companies, yet the agency is now providing financial support beyond the original terms. Other contractors will note this. Firms competing for future work, including commercial station developers, will read it as evidence that NASA values continuity of supply and is willing to bend the fixed-price model to preserve it.
The remark about pricing and "CLD suppliers" points to an emerging coordination problem. Companies bidding to build private stations must plan their business cases around a transportation cost that NASA and Boeing have not disclosed in detail. If Starliner seats are priced differently from Crew Dragon seats, the effective cost of accessing a private station varies by provider. Station developers want transparency to model revenue, while the two crew providers have commercial reasons to keep prices confidential. Expect pressure from CLD bidders for clearer pricing.
The new rocket is an opening for competitors. Candidates for human-rated service would include vehicles such as ULA's Vulcan, though the source material does not specify which rocket is being certified, and readers should not assume it. What is clear is that the certification pipeline is now formally part of the program. Whichever vehicle is chosen gains a marquee crew mission, and ULA's ability to retain Boeing's business depends on how quickly it can meet human-rating requirements while its Atlas V inventory dwindles.
For Boeing, the announcement stabilizes a program that has cost the company heavily. Additional flights provide revenue visibility and a path to recouping investment, but the uncrewed flight is a high-stakes test. Another significant anomaly would raise questions about whether the program can continue at all. The company's public enthusiasm reflects the importance of avoiding that outcome.
Station operations will continue to lean on Crew Dragon. Expedition 75 is currently aboard, and Crew-13 is set to launch on October 1. The near-term workload sits with SpaceX, so any Crew Dragon issue would expose the lack of a second operational option. Separately, a report that NASA is troubleshooting the transporter for the station's large robotic arm is a reminder that station infrastructure has its own constraints, although the reports describe the problem as possibly temporary.
The first hard test comes with the uncrewed flight, targeted no earlier than December. The mission needs to show that the redesigned propulsion and related systems perform reliably during launch, rendezvous, docking and return. A clean flight would support the 2028 crewed date. A problem would likely push the schedule right and intensify debate about the value of continued investment.
Between now and 2028, watch for these markers:
The larger question is whether a second provider has strategic value beyond its direct flights. With SpaceX's Starship now reaching orbit and its Crew Dragon flying routinely, NASA's rationale rests on risk mitigation. That logic is sound as long as the second provider can eventually fly. The next twelve months will show whether Boeing can turn a long-delayed program into a functioning one.
Because this analysis is about crewed spaceflight.
Next crewed launch
HOLDWed, Nov 25 (time not set yet) · Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center