
Short answer: A dedicated Falcon 9 launch lists at $74M as of 2026-09-01, which is roughly $3,250/kg if you fill its 22,800 kg low-Earth-orbit capacity - and almost nobody does. Most customers never buy a whole rocket: a Transporter or Bandwagon rideshare slot costs $7,000 per kilogram with a 50 kg minimum, so $350k buys a place on the same vehicle. The list price is also not what the flight costs SpaceX, which reflies boosters many times over; it is what the market pays, and it has held near this level because nothing else flies at this cadence.
List and rideshare prices as of 2026-09-01. Figures track the launch cost guide; contract prices vary.
| Option | Price | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Dedicated Falcon 9, list price | $74M | The whole rocket, your orbit, your schedule. 22,800 kg to LEO, 8,300 kg to GTO. |
| Dedicated, per kilogram at full payload | $3,250/kg | The figure usually quoted as the Falcon 9 cost per kilogram. It assumes a payload that fills the rocket, which is rare. |
| Rideshare (Transporter / Bandwagon) | $7,000/kg, $350k minimum | 50 kg minimum to a standard sun-synchronous drop-off. Fixed orbit and fixed date - you fly when the mission flies. |
| Falcon Heavy, dedicated | $97M | Three cores. Worth it only past Falcon 9's 8,300 kg to GTO, or for high-energy trajectories. |
| NASA and US government missions | $100M-$300M+ | Well above list: mission assurance, range requirements, extended reviews and schedule guarantees are all priced in. A NASA science launch is not a commercial launch. |
$74M for a dedicated launch at list price, as of 2026-09-01. A rideshare slot on the same vehicle starts at $350k for 50 kg.
Booster reuse and flight rate. A first stage flies many times over, and fixed costs are spread across a cadence no other provider matches - SpaceX flew 109 orbital missions in 2026 by mid-September, while the next-busiest Western provider flew 16.
SpaceX has never published a per-flight internal cost, and any figure you see quoted is an estimate. What is knowable is the list price, which is set by what the market will bear rather than by what the flight costs - which is why it has not fallen as reuse improved.
No. Falcon Heavy lists at $97M against Falcon 9 at $74M - roughly a third more for substantially more performance, because two of the three cores are recovered and the upper stage is the same.
Rarely. If your satellite is under a few hundred kilograms, a $350k rideshare slot or a dedicated Electron at $7.5M serves you better than $74M of capacity you cannot fill.